KCcarguy
New member
Well if it doesn't have a V8 then I'm not buying one.
And it better be BOF too.
Well if it doesn't have a V8 then I'm not buying one.
5Gen Owners are so sensative...lol. Geez. 1engineer do you need a hug?
Nope. I just asked a simple question. Why not just move on and get something else?
maybe it is just a blind spot in my thinking but honestly I have never looked at or fooled with the display that gives the mpg calculation
no way it could be accurate given the way errors integrate over time
besides from what I read, those that do the math and compare find that the car computer is optimistic
Why post your dissatisfaction in a place where very few feel the same way? It would be much better if you posted this same story over on the LC board.
Hard to ever fault the consistently clear thinking exhibited in your posts, this one included, but the above is puzzling.
Where else to post about a 4Runner than a 4Runner forum? There are no doubt many non-4Runner owners who read these boards in order to find out about.....surprise....4Runners.
I sympathize, knowing your standards for information quality, but in such a wide environment, things are what they are.
I doubt you'd want the forum re-titled "5th gen satisfied owners only".
this:man...tough crowd. Someone states their honest opinion and they get stoned!
I think is more about buying a vehicle then complaining about everything that was readily apprent if you test drove it and/or did even an iota of research.
It hasn't been dead-on accurate for me, but close enough. If you reset it at each fill-up it's likely to be more accurate. But, I haven't calculated what my standard deviation for MPG is in typical driving, so it would be difficult to say if one or the other is anomalous. I know the app I use is fairly accurate because it uses actual fuel consumed based on volume (what I put in when I fill-up). I honestly don't know how the stock MPG calculator comes to its conclusion for MPG, but I would guess it has something to do with throttle position rather than fuel flow since it doesn't seem to account for time coasting in neutral.It's been dead-on accurate for me when I compare it to my manual calculations. Also, I don't overfill the tank -- I stop as soon as the pump automatically shuts off the first time. I would assume "topping it off" could lead to some minor inaccuracies.
Fuelly.com is a great resource for manually tracking your MPG and comparing it to others. You can set your account up to receive text messages, then all you have to do is text their server your stats at every fill-up -- miles driven, price per gallon, gallons used (MPG).
Here's a screenshot of what the text interface looks like.
![]()
Every time a post like this comes up, I ask the poster if there is a better new midsize SUV than a T4R for the same price. I have yet to get an answer. If there was, I would own one.
I will say their resell is staggering, I bought the car 6 months ago for 36, put 14k miles on it, and sold it for 35,300... so it cost me 700$.
Thank you! If the OP had listed his issues, like many others here have done from gas milage to rear window problems, that's fine. Even to say "Hey I am getting rid of this thing because I am disappointed in it" would be a learning story for owners and potential owners. The 4Runner is not a perfect machine and posting problems and solutions is valuable. But to post about problems to justify to himself and the readers as reasons for buying a different vehicle is suspect to say the least. I have read at least 10 versions of his story on this and other forums in the past. Same script, different person. THAT is why I posted in this thread.
And you are right, it is what it is. Thanks for reading.
That's probably because no matter what anyone says, you'll disagree vehemently, right??
Big surprise there.
Btw..... A low miles Gen4 v8 T4R is better even if it was the same price as a new Gen5.