The 3.4L TRD Supercharger Thread

f945309305bce6323b539d4ca228a257.jpg


Just picked up this gem.
I’ll be swapping it over soon with [MENTION=71738]Smog-guy707[/MENTION]
The rest of the truck will be parted out if anyone is interested in anything.
 
Has anyone encountered a "whirring" noise coming from the back of the supercharger? It sounds like it's coming from the base of the charger and sounds like a small electric motor, almost like a small RC car that changes pitch with RPMs. Once the boost kicks in the sound disappears. I think I'm due for a valve cover job as well though, maybe it's a vacuum leak that when it goes into boost the noise goes away since it's no longer under vacuum?
 
Big thank you to [MENTION=121903]Black798[/MENTION] for helping me get the MAPECU3 piggyback wired in and running me through trouble shooting, the MAPCAL program has its bugs so it made it seem it wasn't working right, till we downloaded the latest version of MAPCAL and forced upgrade firmware on the ECU with that version of MAPCAL, then loading the tune and going from there. Pretty damn sweet seeing the AFRs drop from 14 to 13 to 12 when getting on it. Stoked to see the performance in the hills.
 
Got my 315cc supra injectors installed this last weekend and also replaced all the IAC lines and all the other vacuum lines on the top end of the motor. I was super easy to swap in the supra injectors using the old dust seal from the original injectors.
<a data-flickr-embed="true" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/147275993@N05/48783710332/in/dateposted-public/" title="IMG_20190920_204832"><img src="https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/48783710332_ee79c9cc0d_b.jpg" width="768" height="1024" alt="IMG_20190920_204832"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Initial impression are good, I needed to remap my MAF sensor in the piggyback to even get the truck to run but just with some quick test drives I can definitely feel an improvement. I never had an issue getting the AFRs as low as I wanted but I always felt like the injectors were having to work really hard to do it which was leading to some inconsistencies in the tune. They also had 200k on them and were beginning to get super noisy. Overall the truck seems to run smoother and stronger and the afrs are way more consistent which tells me the injectors are in much more of a happy place in terms of duty cycle now so Im calling it a success. Im interested to see if these change my fuel economy at all but I definitely recommend them to anyone looking to get better control of their fueling.
 
I went on a road trip this weekend and logged 16.5 MPGs with my Supra injectors

I believe I was at 15 before I even supercharged it [emoji23]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Supercharger question

I am on the fence about buying this 4runner. The price is low enough where I can buy it and fix it. I am concerned with the portion that is circled in the picture. Is it a real concern?

Btw the supercharger was installed by the dealership at time of purchase. It got rebuilt about 4 yes ago according to the owner.


6078199432.png
 
Last edited:
It is a common leak area. It looks like someone tried to reseal it without removing it.

Try removing it. It’s a good time to check if the little valve on the elbow is working properly.

One side is sealed and one side has an o-ring. I bought a protec oil filter #146 and the smaller o-ring fits perfectly around that area you will need

Other side uses sealant

Someone can correct me if I am wrong


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I have also noticed my mpgs come up slightly with the Supra injectors. From the low 12s up to 13 now but I also haven't gotten my tune even close to right. It's running rich as hell but definitely even cruising in vacuum feels like it runs stronger and I'm not hitting boost as hard as I was before.
[MENTION=115347]gamefreakgc[/MENTION] I've got a few questions for you about the Supra injectors. Prior to install untill I got boost my short and long term fuel trims were always below 10% in either direction. I'm now seeing them run all over the place for -21 to like +15. I'm mostly attributing this to my tune not being right yet and the stock ecu doesn't quite know what to do. The problem I am having is using the MAF adjust and o2 adjust features in my piggyback I'm not really able to tune open loop at all because it's not consistent when it transitions from closed to open.

Most times it seems to happen in 3rd gear but I'll be sitting right at 12.2 afr and then open loop happens and my gauge pegs on 10 but it doesn't seem to get better no matter how much I adjust the MAF voltage and going too far with the maf results in closed loop running lean.

Biggest issue I am having is after the truck has sat for an hour or two it won't fire back up easily at all. It takes 2 or 3 good 10 second bursts with the starter and it stumbles to life. I think the injectors are flooding it out as soon as I turn the key because after a few cranks I can smell raw fuel. I've adjusted my MAF voltage down .45 volts below 500 rpm but it didn't seem to help much. Kinda like open loop is unresponsive to my adjustments. Any ideas what I should try to remedy that?
 
I have also noticed my mpgs come up slightly with the Supra injectors. From the low 12s up to 13 now but I also haven't gotten my tune even close to right. It's running rich as hell but definitely even cruising in vacuum feels like it runs stronger and I'm not hitting boost as hard as I was before.

[MENTION=115347]gamefreakgc[/MENTION] I've got a few questions for you about the Supra injectors. Prior to install untill I got boost my short and long term fuel trims were always below 10% in either direction. I'm now seeing them run all over the place for -21 to like +15. I'm mostly attributing this to my tune not being right yet and the stock ecu doesn't quite know what to do. The problem I am having is using the MAF adjust and o2 adjust features in my piggyback I'm not really able to tune open loop at all because it's not consistent when it transitions from closed to open.

Most times it seems to happen in 3rd gear but I'll be sitting right at 12.2 afr and then open loop happens and my gauge pegs on 10 but it doesn't seem to get better no matter how much I adjust the MAF voltage and going too far with the maf results in closed loop running lean.

Biggest issue I am having is after the truck has sat for an hour or two it won't fire back up easily at all. It takes 2 or 3 good 10 second bursts with the starter and it stumbles to life. I think the injectors are flooding it out as soon as I turn the key because after a few cranks I can smell raw fuel. I've adjusted my MAF voltage down .45 volts below 500 rpm but it didn't seem to help much. Kinda like open loop is unresponsive to my adjustments. Any ideas what I should try to remedy that?

I can share my experience but no guarantee it will fix your issues. It sounds like you have 3 main challenges, closed to open loop transition, open loop and startup.

1. Closed to open loop transition is a bit of a moving target. On my auto, it happens at around 60-70% throttle and around 7 PSI of the max 10 PSI that I see, so pretty heavy throttle. There's no good way to tell when it changes from open to closed loop except for the AFR's. I've learned to not drive in that transition area very much since mine will go rich as well as I have open loop enrichment via the O2 overlapping with fuel injector increase so it also tends to run rich. However, I will also say it takes the ECU a while to "learn" the new O2 skew voltages. It will start out super rich and then eventually start to pull fuel out to where you actually want it. Normally though you'd want to tune open loop first and then work backwards for closed loop. I actually am pulling fuel at all values except for 9 PSI+ over 4000 RPM's since I have a extra water/meth injector sending fuel. I'm guessing that at elevation with no extra fuel systems, you might see the same.

2. Open loop should actually be easy to tune. You want to view your tune as if you had two: closed loop is controlled primarily by the O2 sensor (use the MAF tune only to help dial in your STFT's close to 0) and open loop is exclusively controlled by your MAF tune since the ECU totally ignores O2 sensor voltages at open loop. For me I don't use the MAF since driving the injector pulse width is simpler but I realize you don't have that option. Try to limit your MAF voltage skewing to open loop as much as possible, the less tuning you have in closed loop the better. A great tip is use as little tables as possible. The more you add the more complicated it gets and also increases the risk of one value counteracting the other.

3. For the startups, take out any MAF skew under vacuum. That's across all RPM ranges and all vacuum values, except for maybe 1 PSI below boost (for me that's around 13.6 PSIA, you might be closer to 12 with elevation). For the ranges of 0-1500 RPM's make sure you have no MAF voltage change, O2 sensor change, nothing that would affect startup. The Supra injectors do run a bit rich at first but not enough to keep it from starting. They only flow around 25% more than stock injectors and are completely within the range of the ECU's ability to adjust. After a dozen or so cold startups the ECU will take out that extra fuel so you'll be more in the 11-12 AFR range on a cold start.

There's also an issue some have reported about a bad signal on the crank & camshaft sensor when using a piggyback. I had this on my previous engine whenever I had to reset the fuel trims or changed the tune and it would go away after a few weeks. It's never done it on the new engine (same wiring), so I can't say definitively what the cause was, other than it can go away on its own.
 
Last edited:
I can share my experience but no guarantee it will fix your issues. It sounds like you have 3 main challenges, closed to open loop transition, open loop and startup.

1. Closed to open loop transition is a bit of a moving target. On my auto, it happens at around 60-70% throttle and around 7 PSI of the max 10 PSI that I see, so pretty heavy throttle. There's no good way to tell when it changes from open to closed loop except for the AFR's. I've learned to not drive in that transition area very much since mine will go rich as well as I have open loop enrichment via the O2 overlapping with fuel injector increase so it also tends to run rich. However, I will also say it takes the ECU a while to "learn" the new O2 skew voltages. It will start out super rich and then eventually start to pull fuel out to where you actually want it. Normally though you'd want to tune open loop first and then work backwards for closed loop. I actually am pulling fuel at all values except for 9 PSI+ over 4000 RPM's since I have a extra water/meth injector sending fuel. I'm guessing that at elevation with no extra fuel systems, you might see the same.

2. Open loop should actually be easy to tune. You want to view your tune as if you had two: closed loop is controlled primarily by the O2 sensor (use the MAF tune only to help dial in your STFT's close to 0) and open loop is exclusively controlled by your MAF tune since the ECU totally ignores O2 sensor voltages at open loop. For me I don't use the MAF since driving the injector pulse width is simpler but I realize you don't have that option. Try to limit your MAF voltage skewing to open loop as much as possible, the less tuning you have in closed loop the better. A great tip is use as little tables as possible. The more you add the more complicated it gets and also increases the risk of one value counteracting the other.

3. For the startups, take out any MAF skew under vacuum. That's across all RPM ranges and all vacuum values, except for maybe 1 PSI below boost (for me that's around 13.6 PSIA, you might be closer to 12 with elevation). For the ranges of 0-1500 RPM's make sure you have no MAF voltage change, O2 sensor change, nothing that would affect startup. The Supra injectors do run a bit rich at first but not enough to keep it from starting. They only flow around 25% more than stock injectors and are completely within the range of the ECU's ability to adjust. After a dozen or so cold startups the ECU will take out that extra fuel so you'll be more in the 11-12 AFR range on a cold start.

There's also an issue some have reported about a bad signal on the crank & camshaft sensor when using a piggyback. I had this on my previous engine whenever I had to reset the fuel trims or changed the tune and it would go away after a few weeks. It's never done it on the new engine (same wiring), so I can't say definitively what the cause was, other than it can go away on its own.

Im in the same boat just trying to avoid open loop. Mine seems to go into it easier then your buy the sound of it or I just have a heavy foot haha. Pretty much it will ran clear through second gear fine but once it shifts to 3rd and gets load on it it pops open loop and the afr plumits and it doesn't want to come into closed loop. Kinda like how with cruise control it wont go back into 4th for a long time once it downshifts.

I am finding the same that over the entire load and rpm band I am needing to pull at minimum 5% fuel in order to keep the fuel trims in line but I have gotten those pretty spot on where they need to be.

Thankfully my piggyback isnt tied into the cam and crank sensors, it controls timing directly through the igniter channels which is how I am able to advance the timing.

Right after I made that last post I took some logs of the truck cranking and not starting. I skewed the maf value down about 40% so when it starts cranking its basically telling the injectors to not fire at all. It seems to be helping the more times I start it but if it doesn't work tomorrow morning my next step will be zeroing out the lower maf value and trying to let the stock ecu figure its shit out.
 
Im in the same boat just trying to avoid open loop. Mine seems to go into it easier then your buy the sound of it or I just have a heavy foot haha. Pretty much it will ran clear through second gear fine but once it shifts to 3rd and gets load on it it pops open loop and the afr plumits and it doesn't want to come into closed loop. Kinda like how with cruise control it wont go back into 4th for a long time once it downshifts.

I am finding the same that over the entire load and rpm band I am needing to pull at minimum 5% fuel in order to keep the fuel trims in line but I have gotten those pretty spot on where they need to be.

Thankfully my piggyback isnt tied into the cam and crank sensors, it controls timing directly through the igniter channels which is how I am able to advance the timing.

Right after I made that last post I took some logs of the truck cranking and not starting. I skewed the maf value down about 40% so when it starts cranking its basically telling the injectors to not fire at all. It seems to be helping the more times I start it but if it doesn't work tomorrow morning my next step will be zeroing out the lower maf value and trying to let the stock ecu figure its shit out.

You probably have a lot more open roads than I do. I commute in traffic all day so other than passing on the interstate I don't even have a chance to get on it very much!
 
I can share my experience but no guarantee it will fix your issues. It sounds like you have 3 main challenges, closed to open loop transition, open loop and startup.

1. Closed to open loop transition is a bit of a moving target. On my auto, it happens at around 60-70% throttle and around 7 PSI of the max 10 PSI that I see, so pretty heavy throttle. There's no good way to tell when it changes from open to closed loop except for the AFR's. I've learned to not drive in that transition area very much since mine will go rich as well as I have open loop enrichment via the O2 overlapping with fuel injector increase so it also tends to run rich. However, I will also say it takes the ECU a while to "learn" the new O2 skew voltages. It will start out super rich and then eventually start to pull fuel out to where you actually want it. Normally though you'd want to tune open loop first and then work backwards for closed loop. I actually am pulling fuel at all values except for 9 PSI+ over 4000 RPM's since I have a extra water/meth injector sending fuel. I'm guessing that at elevation with no extra fuel systems, you might see the same.

2. Open loop should actually be easy to tune. You want to view your tune as if you had two: closed loop is controlled primarily by the O2 sensor (use the MAF tune only to help dial in your STFT's close to 0) and open loop is exclusively controlled by your MAF tune since the ECU totally ignores O2 sensor voltages at open loop. For me I don't use the MAF since driving the injector pulse width is simpler but I realize you don't have that option. Try to limit your MAF voltage skewing to open loop as much as possible, the less tuning you have in closed loop the better. A great tip is use as little tables as possible. The more you add the more complicated it gets and also increases the risk of one value counteracting the other.

3. For the startups, take out any MAF skew under vacuum. That's across all RPM ranges and all vacuum values, except for maybe 1 PSI below boost (for me that's around 13.6 PSIA, you might be closer to 12 with elevation). For the ranges of 0-1500 RPM's make sure you have no MAF voltage change, O2 sensor change, nothing that would affect startup. The Supra injectors do run a bit rich at first but not enough to keep it from starting. They only flow around 25% more than stock injectors and are completely within the range of the ECU's ability to adjust. After a dozen or so cold startups the ECU will take out that extra fuel so you'll be more in the 11-12 AFR range on a cold start.

There's also an issue some have reported about a bad signal on the crank & camshaft sensor when using a piggyback. I had this on my previous engine whenever I had to reset the fuel trims or changed the tune and it would go away after a few weeks. It's never done it on the new engine (same wiring), so I can't say definitively what the cause was, other than it can go away on its own.

Im in the same boat just trying to avoid open loop. Mine seems to go into it easier then your buy the sound of it or I just have a heavy foot haha. Pretty much it will ran clear through second gear fine but once it shifts to 3rd and gets load on it it pops open loop and the afr plumits and it doesn't want to come into closed loop. Kinda like how with cruise control it wont go back into 4th for a long time once it downshifts.

I am finding the same that over the entire load and rpm band I am needing to pull at minimum 5% fuel in order to keep the fuel trims in line but I have gotten those pretty spot on where they need to be.

Thankfully my piggyback isnt tied into the cam and crank sensors, it controls timing directly through the igniter channels which is how I am able to advance the timing.

Right after I made that last post I took some logs of the truck cranking and not starting. I skewed the maf value down about 40% so when it starts cranking its basically telling the injectors to not fire at all. It seems to be helping the more times I start it but if it doesn't work tomorrow morning my next step will be zeroing out the lower maf value and trying to let the stock ecu figure its shit out.

And I'm just sitting here like, email me better tunes please :thanks:
 
And I'm just sitting here like, email me better tunes please :thanks:

Get me some logs and I'll get you a new tune real quick haha.

So thought I was into something skewing the MAF voltage way down. Went out this morning and started the truck it fired right away. Great sign. Shut it down went and did some things inside for an hour came out to leave and it fired right up. Alright cool I think I've got it dialed. Drive it to class and come out 3 hours later and it just cranks. 3 tries later it stumbles to life. Drive to work come out two hours later and same story.

So since the MAF skew doesn't seem to help starting consistently when j got home I pulled the efi fuse, re flashed the tune to have no values in the o2 or maf tables below 600 rpms. Tried starting the truck and 3 attempts later it started smelling like raw fuel which I expected. I'll give it a few days and see if things improve as the stock computer relearns the injectors. If not guess it's back to the drawing board. It sucks because everywhere else in the tune is spot on and super consistent
 
Smog-guy707-- thanks for the response. At this point I might just buy the 4runner and part it out with the supercharger and all things related to be sold as a package.
 
Is the extra 50hp and HP/TQ curve flattening worth it?

That's a very subjective question! No one can answer that for you, only you can. What are your goals for your rig? If it's just a weekend toy/offroading rig, probably not. There's no practical use for the supercharger except for towing if you have issues pulling heavy loads. If it's your daily driver then perhaps it is worth it. I enjoy it, but I've got like an extra 130 HP/TQ lol.
 
That's a very subjective question! No one can answer that for you, only you can. What are your goals for your rig? If it's just a weekend toy/offroading rig, probably not. There's no practical use for the supercharger except for towing if you have issues pulling heavy loads. If it's your daily driver then perhaps it is worth it. I enjoy it, but I've got like an extra 130 HP/TQ lol.


Is the extra 50hp and HP/TQ curve flattening worth it?

Also worth it if your truck is 1200lbs over stock lol. Id almost say its necessary but Im also well above the stock 50 hp/tq gains and all in for significantly less than a "new" unit from magnuson.
 
I stumbled upon a 99 w 200k miles auto 2wd with a 2nd gen sc. What would you guys pay for it? I believe i can get it for around 2.5k. Good deal or no?
 
I stumbled upon a 99 w 200k miles auto 2wd with a 2nd gen sc. What would you guys pay for it? I believe i can get it for around 2.5k. Good deal or no?

That's a screaming deal if it's in good shape mechanically and cosmetically. 2WD is a little bit of a drawback but the charger alone is worth $1000-$1500 used, depending on condition.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,089
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top