4Runner Rated Last Place???

She does a really bad job in that video. out right dogging the runner. in the paper copy the review was pretty pointless, you could not come away with anything, like real world testing wise. but thats what I notice with that rag, there is no real use data. I am glad I did not have to pay to read it, as I would not pay CR any money for anything.
 
Everything she complains about is why I would buy it. Stiff ride, truck handling, high step to get in, straight leg driving position, and ability to do off road. I can drive over a curb in my 4Runner, but I'd be scared to in a Ford Escape. If I had to sacrifice guts for some more expensive interior materials, I'd pass.
 
they do not compare everything, nor give you a good feeling they even tried. it certainly cannot get much worse of a magazine. reviews are pointless.
 
Funny thing is if you flip that list completely backwards... then it looks just about right!

Maybe even throw the Toyota Vanza on there near the bottom too while your at it.
 
Reminds me of this old CR article I have in one of my Car books. In 1972 they tested 9 “sports sedans” and rated the BMW 2002tii dead last and a Peugeot first. Their complaints about the BMW were low ground clearance, engine noise at full throttle and fuel economy (of course).

Anyone who knows anything about sports sedans can see how ridiculous that is. Like judging the best car on how well it floats. If it were up to CR the Toyota Prius would be the only vehicle available to the general public.
 
I'm not a fan of putting much stock in reports written by people who are paid for that sort of thing. I find it is much more useful to read reviews written by someone who owns the product. It may seem odd, but I specifically seek out negative input so I can determine what people don't like about the product. After reading the negative comments I can decide if the user is a "cry baby" or if they raise valid points that may be a concern to me as well. There's enough information on the internet for consumers to make informed and balanced decisions before plunking down our hard earned cash. Bottom line, like this group, I don't care what CR says, I love my T4R.
 
That lady is a dyke, she should like the car.. What's wrong with her?

Not for anything but, anyone seriously looking at a 4runner, knows what the 4runner is about, what it is built to do, and is willing to pay top dollar for a functional SUV. If i wanted a AWD lazyboy to put groceries in the back, and drive my kids to soccer, I would get something else.

Actually, no, scratch that, I love mine, and everything about it.
 
LMAO!!! Notice that the dumb broad in the Youtube video is NOT the one driving it up the "really rough rock hill".

"My kids"... Sure lady, you have kids, uh huh... :lmao:

Anything CS says = CRAP! Usually, their lowest ratings are the best products. I think their deal is "Pay us or we'll rate you low".

"Jack Wagons!!!" :D
 
I think their deal is "Pay us or we'll rate you low".

"Jack Wagons!!!" :D

No, say what you want about CR but they don't really have a bias based on what you are saying. They don't even take advertisements and if you notice when you look at products in Lowe's or Home Depot that have been rated a "Best Buy" it always says "...by a leading consumer research magazine" because CR won't let them use their name for advertisement.

I do still believe that CR has a bias toward Honda in general but it isn't because Honda pays them for it.
 
Anyone who knows anything about sports sedans can see how ridiculous that is. Like judging the best car on how well it floats.

LOL! This comment cracked me up. I suddenly imagined all these reviewers with serious, straight-faced expressions slowly driving cars down boat ramps into a lake and furiously taking notes on how far they went before they sank.

But like some folks mentioned up above, CR has a certain target demographic for their car reviews. Purpose-oriented car buyers (such as someone looking for a real sports car or an off-road vehicle) don't read CR for reviews. They go places like these forums and read the purpose-oriented magazines. CR's car reviews are mostly targeted at the older crowed (who generally want comfort above all else) or other folks who really don't know a whole lot about cars and honestly don't really care.

Try not to take it too seriously when CR rates your favorite vehicle very low. :)
 
No, say what you want about CR but they don't really have a bias based on what you are saying. They don't even take advertisements and if you notice when you look at products in Lowe's or Home Depot that have been rated a "Best Buy" it always says "...by a leading consumer research magazine" because CR won't let them use their name for advertisement.

I do still believe that CR has a bias toward Honda in general but it isn't because Honda pays them for it.


Incorrect. I worked on a car brand and we paid a king's ransom to use the CR name. Same with Polk, JD Power, Car&Driver, etc.
 
Incorrect. I worked on a car brand and we paid a king's ransom to use the CR name. Same with Polk, JD Power, Car&Driver, etc.

Not calling you a liar, but I'd have to see it. I have never seen CR name used on any advertisements. I'm sure Lowe's and Home Depot could afford to pay CR for their name. Now Consumers Digest I have seen used but not CR.
 
Incorrect. I worked on a car brand and we paid a king's ransom to use the CR name. Same with Polk, JD Power, Car&Driver, etc.

From CR's website:

NO COMMERCIAL USE POLICY

We accept no advertising and pay for all the products we test. We are not beholden to any commercial interest. Our income is derived from the sale of Consumer Reports®, ConsumerReports.org®, and our other publications and information products, services, fees, and noncommercial contributions and grants. Our Ratings and reports are intended solely for the use of our readers. Neither the Ratings nor the reports may be used in advertising or for any other commercial purpose without our permission. Consumers Union will take all steps open to it to prevent commercial use of its materials, its name, or the name of Consumer Reports®.
 
From CR's website:

NO COMMERCIAL USE POLICY

We accept no advertising and pay for all the products we test. We are not beholden to any commercial interest. Our income is derived from the sale of Consumer Reports®, ConsumerReports.org®, and our other publications and information products, services, fees, and noncommercial contributions and grants. Our Ratings and reports are intended solely for the use of our readers. Neither the Ratings nor the reports may be used in advertising or for any other commercial purpose without our permission. Consumers Union will take all steps open to it to prevent commercial use of its materials, its name, or the name of Consumer Reports®.

I'm looking at the CR materials right in front of me. Maybe their policy has changed or maybe they chose their words you pasted here very carefully.
 
I'm so over CR.
Ive read CR for years. Many times I'd jot down their "best buys" only to find the model discontinued or not available on the West coast. Other times their choice would leave me scratching my head, especially when it came to food items, wine, etc. When I bought my house a few years ago, i bought the top rated washer, dryer, refer. 2 out of three of those items were disappointing or failed in some way.
The final straw was when my dad showed me the 4runner review last year...
It complained about the abysmal gas mileage. Meanwhile the glowing review of the Highlander touted it's "class-leading mileage"...the difference was 1 freakin' MPG!!!
 
I wouldn't even think twice about consumer reports review, look at their video review...this lady doesn't know anything. YouTube - Toyota 4Runner Review

Hmmm. Slight shaking in the body, akward handling, not very main road friendly... Where exactly do these come into play when your broke down on the side of the road? The lady seems to forget one of the biggest draws to 4Runners is it's reliability. There are more 10+ year old 4Runners, as well as other Toyota vehicles on the road today, thannew, or fairly new, American made counterparts. I have two friends that have both gone through 1 Cherokee because of mechanical issues in the past 4 years. So, while you Cherokee lovers are broke down on the side of the road just remember that us sore ass, motion sickness 4Runner drivers are making due just fine as we pass you by on the highway. :)
 
CR clearly does bad SUV reviews. I thought that meaybe they just don't like 4Runner, and I checked review for Ford Escape 2008 which I had for 3 years. Same thing - they didn't do a good job, the review does not reflect the vehicle at all. I think that lady should review minivans.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
278,309
Messages
3,554,071
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top