No, they engineered it wrong. Ball joints carrier the weight of the vehicle. They should carry the weight like a stick in a cup. As the stick and cup wears, there stick continues to stay in the cup. This is the case in almost all cars and trucks that use ball joints.
The Toyota design is upside down. So instead of carrying the weight like in the palm of your hand, it is carrying the weight upside down in the fingers and it is only time before it fails.
Yes, the recall was done because of manufacturer defect but as more and more 4runners ,tacoma's, and Tundras crash and burn, Toyota might do some thing about it.
So what's the difference between the 2 bolts (90105-10406 and 90105-10505)?
I
Also, can you show me a ball joint that holds it the way you are saying? The loading on the suspension puts the steering knuckle in tension, so no matter the orientation of the LBJ, the cup is in tension, so "carrying the weight in the fingers" as you say. What you describe as "in the palm on your hand" is compressive force on the LBJ.
I am not sure what the difference is, I would like to know myself.
All the pressure is in the base or the cup of the joint.
![]()
The toyota one has lips that hold the ball joint from pulling through. As it wears, the joint will fall apart.
![]()
Those are great pics, but I am not seeing the real difference. The first pic looks like it has, for lack of a better term, a deeper grip on the ball, which would be good, but I don't think that is what you are talking about. You put both of those in tension, and the stress is going to be in the same spot for both
Sorry for the ignorance.
The tension on the top photo is the joint being pushed into and the tension of the bottom photo is that the joint is being pulled out of.
the salvage was $1350+$500 deductable gave me $6k
The salvage was $1350+$500 deductable gave me $6k but I still owed 4K so have 2K to handle all the repairs.
I have USAA for my insurance
Only thing I don't like about the new design is that there are only two bolts holding them in rather than the 4 in the previous design. Otherwise I can see where it would keep damage to a minimum in a failure.
I still say proper maintenance and this can all be avoided anyway. I know when my ball joints were getting up there in miles and abuse, the truck had a noticeable handling change, and just general slop in the front end. When I noticed it was getting worse, I picked up a new daily driver until I had time to go through and replace everything I wanted to. I don't think I've read a post on here that someone said the truck was fine up until the exact point of total failure. Everyone seems to notice a noise or a feel before the breaking point. That should probably be a warning.