Since when did Venza become an SUV?

Register to hide this ad
it's called "stacking the deck"

make the competition you use to be inferior or "out of class"...to sway or dictate test results.

I guess jeep needs the win pretty bad:crutch:
 
So they finally put Jeep Cherokee in the same class as Ford Edge and Toyota Venza. It's a shame for Jeep that their Cherokee is not competing with Ford Explorer and Toyota Highlander anymore.
 
"What was once a class dominated by truck-based gas guzzlers has given way almost entirely to car-based models with many of the features that made SUVs popular, but offer improved ride and handling, fuel economy and interior space."

That quote straight from the article gives the heep the exact type of classification it now fits in...car-based model:boxer:
 

It became an "SUV" after the initial positioning of it not being an SUV failed.

When the Venza launched, Toyota placed it in the car section of their website (next to the Camry and Avalon) and even declined competing in Motor Trend's "X of the Year" competition because MT would not let it compete as a car.

I'd guess that Toyota would have preferred entering a '14 Highlander if the test occurred closer to the on-sale date. As it stands, the choices were a '13 Highlander (on its way out and the 7-seat capacity gets it nothing in the test); a '13 4Runner (given the testing criteria, it would not have been pretty); or Venza.

Note: I didn't read it closely, but it is strange that Nissan didn't send a Pathfinder. I'm wondering if the requirement was for it to be a 5-seater (hence the Murano, Edge, and Venza instead of the Pathfinder, Explorer, and Highlander).
 
My wife drives Venza, we both love it. drives like a car and awesome for Colorado winter driving. Cost about as much as my 4runner. Is it SUV? Hell no!
AWD Camry but better looking and more cargo space. power liftgate is my favorite feature. I`d pay to have that in 4runner but no avail.
 
My wife drives Venza, we both love it. drives like a car and awesome for Colorado winter driving. Cost about as much as my 4runner. Is it SUV? Hell no!
AWD Camry but better looking and more cargo space. power liftgate is my favorite feature. I`d pay to have that in 4runner but no avail.

Completely agree. The Venza is a very very nice car! It drives very comfortably and is pretty quick. I just couldn't allow myself to buy a wagon without RS or AMG badging for man-card's sake.
 
I agree with the above. I just rented a venza from avis last week while on vacation.
they consider it in their suv class but clearly it is a crossover. It is a nice mom car. Drives well and spacious.
 
It doesn't matter what vehicles a publication matches together the Jeep always wins because editors are swayed by advertising. Motor Trend tested the WK2 JGC against the T4R Trail and basically said the Jeep was better in every way.
 
My wife drives Venza, we both love it. drives like a car and awesome for Colorado winter driving. Cost about as much as my 4runner. Is it SUV? Hell no!
AWD Camry but better looking and more cargo space. power liftgate is my favorite feature. I`d pay to have that in 4runner but no avail.

Venza's not bad at all imo.

Who cares what auto manufacturer's or magazine's classify as an SUV, the consumer should be smart enough to make that determination themselves. :beer:
 
It became an SUV like every other wanna-be when people confused a Sport Utility vehicle with a glorified hatchback with optional AWD.

SUVs will always be in my mind a body on frame construction, dedicated 4WD system(meaning at least a 2 stage transfer-case), logitudal engine with front and rear driveshafts, and will often be based on a truck platform.

CUV= Porked up hatchbacks and minivans they want to make seem cool.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,089
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top