fourfive
Senior Member
For some reason I am having a hard time grasping IFS alignment and why the G setting gets more clearance. Seems like more positive caster gets more clearance so why wouldn't A be better?
Really disappointed as I switched from D to G and lost clearance. Can someone look at these and tell me what happened?
The short answer is that the way the spc uca and stock lca impact caster and firewall clearance work oppositely.
I’m gonna use the ubj & lbj as reference points for the top & bottom of the wheel. If the ubj on the spc uca is directly above the lbj on lca that would be 0 degrees caster since a line between those 2 points would be vertical.
As we know, adjusting the lca to move the lbj forward or away from the firewall will increase caster because now the vertical line from lbj to ubj is angled. Increasing caster by adjusting the lca will create more firewall clearance.
However, to increase caster via the spc uca, you would move the ubj closer towards the ‘A’ setting which would move the ubj towards the firewall which will reduce tire clearance. Adjusting the spc uca so that the ubj is closer the the firewall increases caster because now the line from the ubj in relation to the lbj is angled (relative to a vertical line or 0 caster).
If the ubj is moved towards ‘G’ (away from the firewall) this decreases caster because now the angle between the ubj in relation to the lbj is decreased & becomes “more vertical” or perpendicular. This will increase tire clearance.
Hopefully my attempt to answer your question didn’t confuse you more.