Who's ready for President Trump!

Status
Not open for further replies.
:sigh:

Another disappointing and inaccurate response.

At what point will a liberal/democrat look himself in the mirror and admit that his party is just as culpable as the other.

It's funny you want to talk culpability and bias on one hand while on the other rejecting the notion of a GOP who's plainly stated platform is opposing everything the president does.

Sounds like we could all take a big gulp from the culpability fountain if you ask me.
 
The point I'm gradually eluding to is that you should expect these type of candidates when the voters fail to hold their parties accountable or even acknowledge their own failures and mistakes as illustrated by ndcent and CXS.

and it is my point that it is the voters who too often fail themselves.
 
It's funny you want to talk culpability and bias on one hand while on the other rejecting the notion of a GOP who's plainly stated platform is opposing everything the president does.

Sounds like we could all take a big gulp from the culpability fountain if you ask me.

That one is actually a two way street. The "my way or else" attitude by both congress and the President, has resulted in little getting accomplished. Even Bill Clinton came more center than left, when in office, resulting in things getting done. Neither congress, or the President, serve one party or the other. They serve the people, of both parties after elected. The attitudes need to go, and working together needs to happen. By all sides.
 
and you come from 3 hockey countries.......do you play?

I did, I played travel hockey till 8th grade. I played since I like 6 because my uncle coached Riverside Rangers in Windsor, Ontario so my dad signed me up and I loved it. Then I moved to the south so I played lacrosse through high school aka "ice-less hockey".
 
The recession was actually kicked off by Clinton era laws regarding the home building industry, resulting in the "bubble" to burst. .

Can you provide details on that? It was Clinton and not Bush who deregulated the mortgage industry?
 
The recession was actually kicked off by Clinton era laws regarding the..

Glad you corrected that Bush basher but you are not going back far enough.

The problem, any problem really, can be scientifically linked to an exact moment in time. You see, 3 Planck units of time after the Big Bang, a terrible event occurred. All the
 
The point I'm gradually eluding to is that you should expect these type of candidates when the voters fail to hold their parties accountable or even acknowledge their own failures and mistakes as illustrated by ndcent and CXS.



Which party and which "type" of candidates are you referring to?
 
It's funny you want to talk culpability and bias on one hand while on the other rejecting the notion of a GOP who's plainly stated platform is opposing everything the president does.



Sounds like we could all take a big gulp from the culpability fountain if you ask me.


If by "opposing" you mean bank rolling his agenda then I think we are on the same page.

But if you're suggesting that conservatives should rollover after having retaken both house and senate then I think you have a very thin grasp on how things work.
 
If by "opposing" you mean bank rolling his agenda then I think we are on the same page.

But if you're suggesting that conservatives should rollover after having retaken both house and senate then I think you have a very thin grasp on how things work.

Rollover? No. Some compromise would sure be refreshing though. There is zero logic in the idea of their oppose everything schtick, not to mention it's bad for America.
 
Let's just agree that either Trump or Hillary get elected, this country is going to see things happen to it that are going to be big. From what I see in todays society is that we have a melting pot of issues the are quite similar to what we have dealt with in the past, mainly in the end of the 19th and a lot of the 20th centuries. From segregation/civil rights problems, economic downfalls, hatred towards police, gun violence, political promises that probably won't be kept, wars that politics want to start but we can't afford to fund with money and flesh, and fighting(arguing) with countries(Russia, etc.) when we should be stabilizing relations with them. Most of those problems alone changed America a lot between 1900-1970 alone. My take on this election is a woman who just wants to be the first lady in office and only was put into this position because of fame and scandal provided by her husband and on the other hand we have a guy with an above average mouth size who knows that he has enough money of his own to push himself into office using any means necessary, especially his words(which he doesn't need to watch because he has his own financial backing and won't be dropped by financial sponsors) and those words won't only put him in hot water but us too as a nation. They say history repeats itself but whoever we put in office, most of this history will repeat itself in a very short period of time which will ultimately be in danger of putting America on its back. Just my 2 cents.:hatsoff:

P.S.- Vote For Pedro.
 
Last edited:
But if you're suggesting that conservatives should rollover after having retaken both house and senate then I think you have a very thin grasp on how things work.

I think this statement is one of the most telling of how things have gotten to where they are. There is middle ground between getting what you want and 'rolling over'. The fact that you see it this way or choose that terminology shows just how binary things have become.
 


"I actually think this week was the MOST consequential weeks in American politics, perhaps in my entire life, because you are seeing one of America's two big parties literally coming apart at the seams."



Also lol @5:10
 
Last edited:
Rollover? No. Some compromise would sure be refreshing though. There is zero logic in the idea of their oppose everything schtick, not to mention it's bad for America.

The "compromise" is in the funding bills that continue to pass the House and Senate furthering a liberal agenda. You get what you want and still ***** and moan that it isn't enough.

I find it laughable that when Republicans represent the wishes of their constituents it's labeled obstructionism. Yet, when Democrats do so it's Democracy in action.


@-JD-

That sir... is why things have become binary.
 
O4U7HJR.jpg
 

Attachments

  • O4U7HJR.jpg
    O4U7HJR.jpg
    128.4 KB · Views: 91
The "compromise" is in the funding bills that continue to pass the House and Senate furthering a liberal agenda. You get what you want and still ***** and moan that it isn't enough.

I find it laughable that when Republicans represent the wishes of their constituents it's labeled obstructionism. Yet, when Democrats do so it's Democracy in action.


@-JD-

That sir... is why things have become binary.

The GOP represents their constituents when they shutdown the government like spoiled petulant children or plainly refuse to even hold hearings and vote on a SCOTUS nominee even though 65% of Americans think they should.

I guess the problem is the constituency and not the overpaid do nothing brats in the GOP, thanks for the eye opener.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,317
Messages
3,554,126
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top