claydoctor
New member
If I wanted a Nissan Armada, I would have bought one.
Is that a Scion xB or a 4Runner? :repuke:
[![]()
![]()
Holy Crap!
Looks are subjective and that seems to be the biggest issue with the 4Runner and the same was when they went from the 3rd gen to the 4th gen which looked more soccer mom than ever and got a bit chunky and the 3rd gen crowd got over it so it'll be the same for the 5th gens.
i agree completely and won't be considering a 5G limited or SR5… it's Trail Edition all the way. the Trail's tucked up front, rear and sides are the perhaps the biggest aesthetic improvement over the 4G. but i wish they'd been able to tuck up the undercarriage too…Big difference between the look of the 2010 Limited and the Trail IMO.
I saw the Trail in person (see my post) and it looked good next to my 07 Sport. Infact, based on looks alone, I'd swap the 07 Sport for the Trail and never look back.
Not a big fan of the 2010 Limited exterior.
Damn, a brand new 40k car and they couldn't even throw a decent set of rubber mats in it.
Maybe the cardboard mat is Toyota's solution for preventing the accelerator pedal from sticking to the floor mats that were just recalled recently.
I actually liked the cup holders in the front in the 4th gen, I use it every day and have never had any problems with it. I like that it was adjustable to hold smaller items. I have never had anything fall out of it before.
:iagree: and if I pluck out the center movable piece, it becomes a big storage pocket.
I don't like this look at all!
It is too boxy!!
Wait, have the skid plates been cutback like in the photo of the Limited? Is this the same with the trail edition? I can't imagine them taking it on the rubicon with no protection over the fuel tank...
Wait, have the skid plates been cutback like in the photo of the Limited? Is this the same with the trail edition? I can't imagine them taking it on the rubicon with no protection over the fuel tank...
Yep its pretty clear that majority feel the same way. BUT, is boxy always unattractive? Not necessarily. I am sure many will agree that a G-wagon or just about any Land Rover/Range Rover are attractive vehicles. And you dont get much more square than this (after a 110/Defender anyway).
So its really not that its boxy that sucks, its that its boxy done badly, and thats what you get with 'random vehicle generator' approach.
Not to open a whole different can of worms, but an LR3 itch started this week. I have always secretly liked Land Rover, never wanted to own one for obvious reasons (RRR - resale, reliability, running cost). But the LR3 seems to have done well and a good job of shedding the old P.O.S. reputation. Then look at what you can get a very low mileage 2008 LR3 SE V8 with extended warranty for. And compare the specs to a 2010 4R Trail.... The LR3 is a very well equipped vehicle, with a 300HP V8 and loaded with offroad trickery, almost every comfort and luxury feature you look for these days standard, and Land Rovers legendary ride...Let the research begin.
Around here, they seem to run $36k - $50k. That doesn't seem to be a bargain to me.Then look at what you can get a very low mileage 2008 LR3 SE V8 with extended warranty for.
Land Rover has been there for a while. What sort of problems did you have? Electrical gremlins?It's my duty to warn you, I had a 2005 LR3 and traded it for a 2008 Landcruiser. Nothing but problems with the LR3 (same color as the one in your picture too). I got to know Landrover's fleet of loaners. There is also another 4runner owner here on the forums who had an LR3 with the same problems. I can't remember, but I think one of the Mods sent me a JD Powers Rating for the Landrover - dead last.