Rigid RB for '10 - '13 SR5

philsey

New member
OK, so I've searched and read, searched and read .... and it's either my reading comprehension or my search fu, so I'm just going to ask.

I want to put the Rigid RBs (option KH, p/n PT938-89100 (I did get this much)) on my 2010 SR5.

The question is: will these fit my 4R?

TIA.
 
Register to hide this ad
OK, so I've searched and read, searched and read .... and it's either my reading comprehension or my search fu, so I'm just going to ask.

I want to put the Rigid RBs (option KH, p/n PT938-89100 (I did get this much)) on my 2010 SR5.

The question is: will these fit my 4R?

TIA.

Phil, I have these and I don't think they will with 2010 SR5 rocker trim. IIRC it is the reason why it is only a port accessory for the 2014-2016 SR5 and trail and not the limited. You could do some trimming or see if someone is putting their trim up on the classifieds.

Below is a pic, and as you can see they sit pretty tight up against my 2015 SR5 trim piece.

They are a nice option, very practical and look good, especially for mostly on road or light off-road/trail driving, but probably not worth the conversion hassle.

My.02

Hopefully I'm wrong and someone can rebuke my response so it works out for you.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    137.7 KB · Views: 431
Thanks guys.
So, is this ...

RIGID2.jpg

... the trim piece you speak of, or is it below this? If that's it, it looks to be a PITA, plus unsightly if missing.

I have dealer-installed (ca 2010) RBs now but dislike them.
 

Attachments

  • RIGID2.jpg
    RIGID2.jpg
    136.6 KB · Views: 542
Thanks guys.
So, is this ...

View attachment 213409

... the trim piece you speak of, or is it below this? If that's it, it looks to be a PITA, plus unsightly if missing.

I have dealer-installed (ca 2010) RBs now but dislike them.

Yes, that is the piece. I took a picture off of the web and then took a couple shots of mine. With the doors open I think you can see the difference a little better (hopefully). The rocker trim piece on mine is about 3 inches total, top to bottom, if you want to measure and compare directly to yours. The brackets on the running boards align and have it sit almost flush against the bottom of the rocker trim (maybe 1/4" gap) so there is not much wiggle room if your rocker is thicker.

The last two pics are with the running boards on and off, again I think it helps to see the trim differences.

This is a reason why when people with a limited or 2010-2013 SR5 model order shrockworks sliders they offer a "trail" rocker trim piece to replace the original.


You mentioned taking it off, I found this thread when looking for pics.
http://www.toyota-4runner.org/5th-gen-t4rs/124829-has-anyone-removed-running-boards-2012-sr5.html
 

Attachments

  • Rocker Trim 2.jpg
    Rocker Trim 2.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 362
  • IMG_5707.jpg
    IMG_5707.jpg
    134.4 KB · Views: 683
  • IMG_5708.jpg
    IMG_5708.jpg
    135.4 KB · Views: 409
  • IMG_5709.jpg
    IMG_5709.jpg
    135.2 KB · Views: 378
  • IMG_4774.jpg
    IMG_4774.jpg
    139.1 KB · Views: 492
  • IMG_4775.jpg
    IMG_4775.jpg
    137.8 KB · Views: 391
Thanks [MENTION=6302]SimpleMan[/MENTION] and [MENTION=120701]Cymon[/MENTION]

It's quite clear now. Your pics [MENTION=120701]Cymon[/MENTION] helped immensely. Hell, my trim piece is twice the size of a Gen 5.1.

Too much trouble, and probably expense. I've had these for 6 years, I can wait for my Gen 6 replacement.

Much appreciated.
 
Just for clarification, the PT938-89100 part # is for the running boards that were made for the '10-'13 trail. The new KH option shown in Cymon's pics is not what you'd get with the PT938-89100 part #. They do work/look great on the '14-'16 though. Put 'em on mine and have been very happy, wasn't ready for sliders yet. I think at least to me they sit a little tighter/slimmer than the KH rigid running board. As others have said, would need to replace the SR5 trim with the Trail trim for 'em to fit though.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,312
Messages
3,554,089
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top