Alpine INE-W960 vs Kenwood DNX572BH vs Pioneer AVIC-6100NEX

ibmgeek

New member
Which do you recommend for an upgrade from the Tom-Tom integrated audio receiver in our '08 Urban Runner: Alpine INE-W960 vs Kenwood DNX572BH vs Pioneer AVIC-6100NEX. They're all 2015 models. Need phone integration, navi, audio, ... today's basics but top quality.

Thanks for the taking the time to respond.

Rock on!
 
Register to hide this ad
I started off early with in-car navigation back in the '90s. My choice at the time was Alpine. I've had at least, four different Alpine navigation units by upgrading. What I found with each one though, was that they weren't necessarily better. Each new unit was slightly more of a PITA to operate. Not only that, the search function was, and judging by the last one I had, IS HORRIBLE! After not only having the nav units, I'd been through numerous high end Alpine audio head units as well.

To jump brands was not an easy decision for me to make. I felt like I was cheating on my wife. I ended up getting a Kenwood navigation unit, and have been using Kenwoods ever since. SO much easier to use. SO intuitive. They made the right choice teaming up with Garmin.

Now, don't get me wrong, I have had a few high end Pioneer decks thrown in there as well, but not navi. I loved the audio units, and the features they packed, but ended up with Kenwood. I would suggest going to an audio shop, just tell them you are only looking today. Of course, they'll try to do the hard sell, but play around with the new units. You may find you don't like something about one of them that you picked.

I've done that before, and I was really turned off by something a head unit did. It changed my mind right then and there. You may also find a different one that you don't have listed that you may like more.
 
I currently have the kenwood 572 it replaced the 571. User interface is improved. I installed the 571 in place of pioneer's avic-950bh which I hated with a passion. Got rid of it in about a week. Personally not a fan of alpine's user interface and icons. I went with kenwood initially because of the navigation. It utilizes a garmin user interface which I am used to and I really like a lot. I upgrade every year, at least I have for the past 4 years. I like to eq's on the alpine and pioneer way better than the kenwood. The pioneers are a lot better nowadays. I used to be all about pioneers in the past but they really fell off there about ~6 years ago. My only gripe with the kenwood is the limited eq and the fact that it only has 2 volt preouts. I install mobile electronics for a living for the past ten years and in all honesty, its pretty much all personal preference. Anything name brand is going to be pretty much the same quality. I'd say check them out in person if possible and see how you like the button layout, navigating through the menu, and the overall aesthetics.
Hope that helps some
 
Which do you recommend for an upgrade from the Tom-Tom integrated audio receiver in our '08 Urban Runner: Alpine INE-W960 vs Kenwood DNX572BH vs Pioneer AVIC-6100NEX. They're all 2015 models. Need phone integration, navi, audio, ... today's basics but top quality.
Thanks for the taking the time to respond.
Rock on!

I took a min to look these units up for a comparison and review, So out of the three you mention here..

1st Place goes to,
The Pioneer AVIC-6100NEX, it just Wins over the other two. Just learn the controls before driving. This unit also had a lot of "how to" YouTube videos for it. Check it out here Pioneer on YouTube , This is a Nice unit. :thumbsup:

The Kenwood DNX572BH doesn't seem like a bad choice, just seemed too basic to me. which is my personal opinion, I didn't like the menu's at all .

The Alpine INE-W960 is in last place for Red Flags - bad reviews on the screen visibility, and navigation bugs. Also No HD radio on this unit.
I wouldn't have this thing .
 
Last edited:
I just installed the 4100nex in my '11 trail. I like it a lot, and can't freakin wait for my moto x (1st gen) to be updated to android 5. Google Auto is what I've been waiting for! As it is, just using Bluetooth, its great.

I looked around at other units, as you did. Pioneer just seems to be the reliable, great product.
 
Been trying to decide between the 6100NEX vs the DNX572BH myself and searching online hasn't brought up much info on the Kenwood. I came across this thread so thought would see what the OP or anyone else decided on and how the like it so far on those models?
 
My only gripes with the Pioneer are the stock interface (looks kinda cheap) and getting used to Android Auto. The features aren't as robust as I anticipated them being. For example, you cannot search in Google Play music from the head unit screen. You either have to use voice controls or pick up your phone and search that way, thus defeating the antidistraction goal of Android Auto
 
Decision?

Which do you recommend for an upgrade from the Tom-Tom integrated audio receiver in our '08 Urban Runner: Alpine INE-W960 vs Kenwood DNX572BH vs Pioneer AVIC-6100NEX. They're all 2015 models. Need phone integration, navi, audio, ... today's basics but top quality.

Thanks for the taking the time to respond.

Rock on!

So which stereo did you end up choosing? I'm now in the same boat you were in back in April. Have you finished the install? If so, did you install yourself? I'd love to PM you and ask some questions! I've searched a lot of the threads on here but I'm still completely confused on whether any of these stereos will fit our Urban Runner trim ring, what harness to get for hooking up steering wheel buttons, etc. I'm leaning toward the Kenwood DNX572BH.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
278,315
Messages
3,554,130
Members
248,016
Latest member
Advally Service

Trending content

Back
Top