Clemsonfan15
New member
Visually it's a nice truck. It doesn't come close mechanically though. You'll have more problem with that truck in the future than the 4Runner you just traded in.
Visually it's a nice truck. It doesn't come close mechanically though. You'll have more problem with that truck in the future than the 4Runner you just traded in.
Was trade my 2011 SR5 for this (2011 FX4 F150):
![]()
The SR5 was a big disappointment. The interior felt cheap with all that plastic. Horrible stock radio. Brake sway felt like you were doing an endo on a bike. No driver controlled 2nd row dome light. No 3rd row dome light at all.
And the worst part was the rear sag. Practically dragging bumper when pulling a small popup camper.
Glad I got rid of her.
How odd... I traded in my F150 for a 4Runner. The stuff in the box kept getting wet, and my passengers kept falling off the tailgate when I pulled away. Getting the 3rd row seating in a Limited has made them much happier.
Guess I made a stupid choice based on my real needs, eh?but I'm feeling better now.
Bought a new Ford Truck in 1999 after College. By 85k miles it had a bad clutch and non-functioning transfer case. Enjoy the truck.....it'll go into self-destruct mode after 75k miles. My advice would be to start saving now for your next down-payment because you won't get crap for a trade-in.
Honestly this thread was good for me as I'm considering a supercrew f150 right along with a new 4runner.
The one thing that has me very interested in the Ford is the great Ecoboost motor. 3.5L twin turbo direct injection with a great transmission and running gear. The Ford SYNC system is also highly lauded.
In my opinion Toyota needs to step it up with their powertrain. They need a six speed transmission, motor could certainly use some more power but it is adequate.
^
agreed. but I would not trust ford with a complex FI set up. I just don't have faith in them anymore.
I still love the 4r. Is it slow? yes. Is it fitting my needs? Hell yes.
I've been very much pleased and happy with it thus far.
Mine was a Ranger 4x4. Maybe that's they're worse than F150's. Was yours a 4x4? The mechanic said "oh yeah, these transfer cases fail all the time". Anyway....I thought I'd be patriotic and spend my hard-earned money on a Ford. I'll never do it again.
No. 2004 F150 supercab. Been really reliable. Buying a new vehincle now and it has come down to supercrew f150 with ecoboost or trail edition 4runner.
75% getting a forerunner as the family is growing, just hard to give up the pickup bed. We could be happy with either!
Honestly this thread was good for me as I'm considering a supercrew f150 right along with a new 4runner.
The one thing that has me very interested in the Ford is the great Ecoboost motor. 3.5L twin turbo direct injection with a great transmission and running gear. The Ford SYNC system is also highly lauded.
In my opinion Toyota needs to step it up with their powertrain. They need a six speed transmission, motor could certainly use some more power but it is adequate.
The 1GR doesn't make enough torque at low RPM to fully utilize a 6AT, IMO. The gearing in the GX 6AT for gears 1-5 is identical to that of the 5AT in the 4Runner. It has a 3.9 final drive versus the 3.7 in the 4Runner. When you factor in the tire size difference, the gearing is pretty dern close. Anyway, the V8 in the GX makes about 40 more ft-lb of torque at 1750 RPM (that is the engine speed for the GX at 70mph in 6th gear) than the 4Runner makes at 2000 RPM (again, 70mph cruising speed). Running through all the gearing calculations, both make about 34hp at the wheels at 70mph (not including drivetrain losses). If you were to mate the 6AT up to the 1GR as is, it would be making something like 20% less power at 70mph... which means that it would downshift to 5th gear a lot more frequently than the V8, thus reducing the benefit of the 6th gear.
Just playing around, I plugged in the V8 torque curve numbers into my calculations for the 4Runner and played with the cruising RPM a bit. I think that the gas mileage would not be that much worse, possibly very close to the V6, if they would offer the V8 + 6AT. That V8 can lug along at a pretty low engine speed and still make the same HP at the wheels.
Damn, I love spreadsheets. :lol: